> If a utility opts to break a contract made prior to ensure grid stability I think what you meant to say is: the utility should not be allowed to EVER sign a

> If a utility opts to break a contract made prior to ensure grid stability I think what you meant to say is: the utility should not be allowed to EVER sign a contract that allows something as silly as bitcoin to preempt providing power to citizens and vital businesses. Energy isn't a commodity, it's a necessity in 2023 and should be treated as such.