2 ms·
I see your point, and I'd much rather see git become a standard rather than a Visual Source Safe clone. At work I chose (yeah, there was no VCS in use before t
by manuletroll 15y ago
I see your point, and I'd much rather see git become a standard rather than a Visual Source Safe clone.
At work I chose (yeah, there was no VCS in use before that) mercurial mainly because we're a small .NET shop, and a nice GUI like TortoiseHg is a big selling point when you're trying to encourage people to use such a tool. There are actually lots of developers who just <i>hate</i> using a CLI. And I don't know how things have evolved, but git was not known to be very windows-friendly two years ago, even apart from the GUI thing.
- seanmcdirmid 15y agoHow is TortioseGIT deficient compared to TortoiseHg? I would think at this point, they are sort of equivalent, but I don't have experience with Mercurial.
- manuletroll 15y agoWell last I checked (which is now quite a while back) it seemed far less polished and stable. However I'd probably have to try it again, according to what I can see on the project's page it seems to have improved a lot.
- wingspan 15y agoFrom my recent experience (past month or so), TortoiseHG is definitely more polished than TortoiseGit. The thing I miss the most is the "Workbench", a single window that contains everything you'd need to do (commit, view history, sync, etc).