3 ms·
Obviously it wouldn't be so straightforward. Microsoft would have access to your usage history, and would be able to easily prove your intended theft as a user
by adverbly 3y ago
Obviously it wouldn't be so straightforward.
Microsoft would have access to your usage history, and would be able to easily prove your intended theft as a user if any of your prompts or usage history made it clear that you were attempting to subvert a license.
If anything, this temporarily shifts the battleground out of the courts and into prompt engineering space.
It would need to look like an accident for a bad actor to pull this off.
- itsoktocry 3y ago>would be able to easily prove Possible, perhaps. But what makes you think this is easily provable? Intent is hard at the best of times.
- justrealist 3y agoI would consider it on you to demonstrate that you can get Copilot to produce copyrighted content without obviously asking for it.
- thfuran 3y agoYou're asking them to go and use copilot with the intention of showing that copilot can be used to unintentionally infringe on copyright? That sounds pretty tricky.