4 ms·
Not according to Everett and about half of practicing physicists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-wo
by Symmetry 3y ago
Not according to Everett and about half of practicing physicists: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation
- joshjob42 3y agoYou can also throw in the Bohmians, since you can express at least non-relativistic QM in purely deterministic terms akin to stat mech (it's purely classical uncertainty about your position in configuration space, and there are stat-mech-like arguments for why that distribution should be very close to the Born distribution). Personally I don't know all that many physicists who think the universe is fundamentally stochastic (I work in quantum information).