3 ms·

That just means they haven't been sued, there is no copyright czar that makes sure infringement never happens. Owners need to sue.

bombcar 3y ago
It won't happen, as factual details can't be copyrighted. So I can't write a story with HP characters, but I can't be copyright struck for writing that there is a book called Harry Potter that has these characteristics. (The above is in the USA, other countries have different policies and rights.)
- freejazz 3y ago
  Harry Potter isn't a fact. A book about the fact that Harry Potter was written and it's about wizards is about as long as that sentence.
  - bombcar 3y ago
    There are at least four books so far in the "unofficial" series, and if you believe that the companies involved wouldn't copyright strike it if they could, that's protected by the first amendment. https://www.mugglenet.com/site/publications/ https://www.mugglenet.com/site/publications/ You can also find unofficial and unauthorized books in other settings, such as Minecraft, but you can argue that it's explicitly permitted as seen here: https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/commercial-use-guidelines-updated https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/commercial-use-guide... - but you can ignore those in the USA in many cases - here's one already: https://www.amazon.com/Minecraft-Monarchies-UnOfficial-Story-ebook/dp/B0CFHQS1YQ https://www.amazon.com/Minecraft-Monarchies-UnOfficial-Story...
    - freejazz 3y ago
      Okay, it's not "skirting incredibly close" to write those reference books, because they are in no way a substitute for the underlying fiction, which is why they would probably be considered a fair use. >There are at least four books so far in the "unofficial" series, and if you believe that the companies involved wouldn't copyright strike it if they could, that's protected by the first amendment. You have no idea what you are talking about. The first amendment isn't a defense to copyright infringement. transformative fair use with a de minimis copying is.
      - bombcar 3y ago
        I was saying that if you believed that the companies involved wouldn't strike these if they could, that belief is covered by the first amendment freedom of religion.
        freejazz 3y ago
        You said they were strikingly close to the line, they aren't. The implicit suggestion being one can just write harry potter fiction by referring to harry potter facts, you can't!

bombcar 3y ago

It won't happen, as factual details can't be copyrighted. So I can't write a story with HP characters, but I can't be copyright struck for writing that there is a book called Harry Potter that has these characteristics. (The above is in the USA, other countries have different policies and rights.)

freejazz 3y ago
Harry Potter isn't a fact. A book about the fact that Harry Potter was written and it's about wizards is about as long as that sentence.
- bombcar 3y ago
  There are at least four books so far in the "unofficial" series, and if you believe that the companies involved wouldn't copyright strike it if they could, that's protected by the first amendment. https://www.mugglenet.com/site/publications/ https://www.mugglenet.com/site/publications/ You can also find unofficial and unauthorized books in other settings, such as Minecraft, but you can argue that it's explicitly permitted as seen here: https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/commercial-use-guidelines-updated https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/commercial-use-guide... - but you can ignore those in the USA in many cases - here's one already: https://www.amazon.com/Minecraft-Monarchies-UnOfficial-Story-ebook/dp/B0CFHQS1YQ https://www.amazon.com/Minecraft-Monarchies-UnOfficial-Story...
  - freejazz 3y ago
    Okay, it's not "skirting incredibly close" to write those reference books, because they are in no way a substitute for the underlying fiction, which is why they would probably be considered a fair use. >There are at least four books so far in the "unofficial" series, and if you believe that the companies involved wouldn't copyright strike it if they could, that's protected by the first amendment. You have no idea what you are talking about. The first amendment isn't a defense to copyright infringement. transformative fair use with a de minimis copying is.
    - bombcar 3y ago
      I was saying that if you believed that the companies involved wouldn't strike these if they could, that belief is covered by the first amendment freedom of religion.
      - freejazz 3y ago
        You said they were strikingly close to the line, they aren't. The implicit suggestion being one can just write harry potter fiction by referring to harry potter facts, you can't!