4 ms·
Of course there is a better interviewing process that we know of. The US military has been using it for like a century.
by iraqmtpizza 3y ago
Of course there is a better interviewing process that we know of. The US military has been using it for like a century.
- tuna74 3y agoCould you describe (or provide a link to an explanation) that process?
- deanmen 3y agoI think he means aptitude tests like the ASVAB.
- nradov 3y agoIf the US military has such a good interviewing process then how do we keep ending up with generals who lose wars? Back during WW2 they fired or promoted officers based primarily on battlefield performance, which eventually worked pretty well for eliminating the incompetent.
- iraqmtpizza 3y agoPromotions and demotions are not the result of an interview process. To make general you need decades of military experience and decisions are highly political. Because war is highly political. Generals can't win if the politicians demand the impossible i.e. use guns to turn Afghanistan into a feminist non-tribal nationalist democracy without settling large numbers of Westerners there. Any educated and ethical general would resign before committing to take on such a mission for the president.