4 ms·
I guess I also don't think that speaking directly about a belief makes it stronger, particularly for discrimination. Many people have commented on HN about expe
by whats_a_quasar 3y ago
I guess I also don't think that speaking directly about a belief makes it stronger, particularly for discrimination. Many people have commented on HN about experiencing caste discrimination but being unable to do anything about it, because Americans have no understanding of what caste discrimination is. "Sunlight is the best disinfectant."
Certainly writing things down can make it easier for concepts to stick around, but I don't think the dynamics are the same for something written down to call out that it's bad. And holy texts are a totally different ballgame.
- Supermancho 3y agoMany people in this thread have completely misunderstood the answer I gave, to the question that was posed. > holy texts are a totally different ballgame. They are not. Historically, written concepts endure longer than unwritten concepts. Again, this is commonly considered self-evident. > I also don't think that speaking directly about a belief makes it stronger, particularly for discrimination It may be worth it, but the hyperbole of denying the effect: eg "How would it extend longevity?" is the dissonance that I have pointed out.