3 ms·
I think you might have miscompared to a day instead of a second? Unless I missed something. But you're right that if we were to be observing the administratium
by datameta 3y ago
I think you might have miscompared to a day instead of a second? Unless I missed something. But you're right that if we were to be observing the administratium reaction over one millisecond in the slowed scenario, it would take 2.73 nanoseconds at full speed, nothing like femtoscale.
- refulgentis 3y ago> ...administratium causes one reaction to take over four days to complete when it would have normally occurred in less than a second. Let x = administartium slowdown effect = 4 days / 1 second x = 4 days * 24 hours / day x = 96 hours * 60 minutes / hour x = 5760 minutes * 60 seconds / minute x = 345600 seconds Wrote this out to also convince myself, I am 35, did physics for 3 years in undergrad, and am apparently still bamboozled by orders of magnitude regularly. Completely unintuitive! In fact, lemme do it in reverse, I'm shocked. Given x = slowdown factor = 100B = 100_000_000_000 x = 100_000_000_000 seconds / (60 seconds / minute) x = 1_666_666_666 / (60 minutes / hour) x = 27_777_777 hours / 24 hours / day x = 1_157_407 days / 365 days / year x = 3,170 years!
- datameta 3y agoWow. Such a better illustration to compare 4 days to 3170 years than comparing 2.73 nanoseconds to a femtosecond. It makes me realize how linear my in-the-moment imagination of nano to femto is.
- actionfromafar 3y agoOr a day to a thousand years, give or take a little.
- anon____ 3y agoWhat's the difference between a millionaire and a billionaire? 1 million seconds == 11.57 days 1 billion seconds == 31.71 years