4 ms·
Twitter. Twitter. Twitter. Not X.
by raydiatian 3y ago
Twitter. Twitter. Twitter.
Not X.
- timbit42 3y agoXitter.
- raydiatian 3y agoThe En-xitification of Xitter
- paulddraper 3y ago? what do you mean
- ta757579 3y agoThey mean that we humans are under no obligation to comply with a corporations branding strategies. See also: Google/Alphabet, Blackwater/MurderInc/Whatevertheyrecallednow
- paulddraper 3y agoOkay. Though for me personally, if someone changes their name, I usually try to call them by that name. But usually not the easiest, I admit.
- clipsy 3y agoCorporations aren’t people.
- iAMkenough 3y agoLegally they are in the United States, where X is based.
- ta757579 3y agoLegally they are, for some purposes. Socially they are not. I feel no social obligation to cooperate with a private for profit corporation's marketing strategy. If I ever have legal documents relating to Twitter I will use whatever their legal name is. Until then, they're Twitter.
- paulddraper 3y agoOkay, but I don't see how that makes a difference.
- xNeil 3y agoAre humans under any obligation to comply with anything?
- iAMkenough 3y agoAre obligations even real? lol.
- nvr219 3y agoThat's deep
- badwolf 3y agoThe owner himself is against transitioning, so it only seems right to deadname his company.