X is still merely acting like a BBS. It is not offering a tech-solution. Community-Notes could become that if AI moderation is trustworthy (judging for facts, a

X is still merely acting like a BBS. It is not offering a tech-solution. Community-Notes could become that if AI moderation is trustworthy (judging for facts, and tone). ... Forums for political discourse are chock full of opinion. Facts are under-quantified. This article's set of rules describes a Gentlemen's Handshake, and offers nothing technologically-speaking. "No": > .. posting or sharing content that may suppress participation or mislead people about when, where, or how to participate in a civic process > You may not impersonate .. > may not deceptively share synthetic or manipulated media that are likely to ... Nothing here is enforceable from a tech perspective. It's all requiring passive human moderation. To contrast, Reddit's Up / Down vote mechanizes moderation, making it active. And one naive evolution could be an AI judging factuality and tone-appropriateness. Clever voting schemes (Reddit, +) don't scale. AI scales but could be "wrong". Human moderation is easily subject to astroturfing. Q: What is the right next-step in moderating conversation to fit within the boundaries of the forum?