3 ms·
Obviously in a very small minority here but I decided almost 10 years ago to give them as much data as possible because they were leading in AI and I want AI to
by alphabetting 3y ago
Obviously in a very small minority here but I decided almost 10 years ago to give them as much data as possible because they were leading in AI and I want AI to have access to as much data on me as possible to make life easier when it gets smart enough. Hasn't panned out yet but I don't really regret it.
- theprivacydad 3y agohaha :)
- pbhjpbhj 3y agoThis is an interesting take: >AI to have access to as much data on me as possible to make life easier when it gets smart enough // And it would seem reasonable if Google's aim were to provide you good AI services rather than to extract as much money from you as possible (and no longer with the benefit of not being evil). Doesn't OpenAI seizing a large chunk of the personal-services LLM market show that you should have just put all your data on the web to be included in Common Crawl? Or at least that Google (well FAANGs) unprecedented access to user data didn't result in them accelerating their AI dominance. I know Google have done a lot, BERT, TensorFlow and such, but that seems to have been orthogonal to having access to user PII.
- cglong 3y agoOpenAI may be ahead in general LLMs, but I get a lot of additional value from Google Maps, Google Photos, and my Discover feed as a result of the data they've collected about me over the years.