3 ms·
WASIX may be of relevance to the article https://wasix.org/ https://wasix.org/
by syrusakbary 3y ago
WASIX may be of relevance to the article
https://wasix.org/ https://wasix.org/
- xena 3y agoI would use WASIX, but my WASM runtime of choice doesn't have WASIX support yet.
- IshKebab 3y agoIsn't most of the point of WASM to enable portable executables? Why wrap your portable bytecode with an entirely non-portable platform API? Seems mad to me.
- jeffparsons 3y agoTo play devil's advocate: targeting WASIX still gives you the benefit of compiling existing code once and running on any OS-architecture pair that Wasmer supports. I long for this sort of thing when building software that needs to run on Linux on multiple architectures inside AWS and also on developers' MacBooks. (Ever tried cross-compiling to macOS? Yeah, I prefer pulling teeth, too.) Caveat: you'd need to use Wasmer forks of, e.g., rustc and Tokio, but I imagine there are at least some people who would be okay with that.