2 ms·
If the report is true, this is the reason. It's a cost thing. Only Apple would have the numbers, but if a large majority of users only use the cable for chargin
by matwood 3y ago
If the report is true, this is the reason. It's a cost thing. Only Apple would have the numbers, but if a large majority of users only use the cable for charging, then it's easy to cut CoGS by including a cheaper cable.
A secondary reason could be sourcing. I don't know cable logistics, but anything Apple includes with the iPhone means they need 100s of millions of them per year.
- Reason077 3y agoYou’re right. But fast-data USB-C cables are also thicker and stiffer, so there’s a UX angle too.