4 ms·

My first impulse with this new wave of tooling is to poke at the privacy policy, especially given there's only the free trial version available... https://abou

My first impulse with this new wave of tooling is to poke at the privacy policy, especially given there's only the free trial version available... https://about.sourcegraph.com/terms/cody-notice https://about.sourcegraph.com/terms/cody-notice seems generally reasonable though, so that's appreciated. Wouldn't mind a more transparency/confirmation on who the partner LLM entities are (Anthropic?), and some verbiage on the downstream impacts of their terms. Should be interesting to give it a test-run with some embedded projects.

Operyl 3y ago
Presumably `Anthropic and OpenAI` according to various documentation.
- jdorfman 3y ago
  We use OpenAI for their embeddings API. We should have this in our docs, but for now you can read this whitepaper if you are interested: https://about.sourcegraph.com/whitepaper/cody-context-architecture.pdf#page=10 https://about.sourcegraph.com/whitepaper/cody-context-archit...
JieJie 3y ago
According to the FAQ, "Cody has one third-party dependency, which is Anthropic's Claude API. In the config, this can be replaced with OpenAI API." https://docs.sourcegraph.com/cody/faq https://docs.sourcegraph.com/cody/faq
- cloudking 3y ago
  Looks like a nicely implemented product, unfortunately my experience with Claude is that it's no where near GPT-4 in terms of coding capabilities.
  - ForHackernews 3y ago
    Does "Open"AI really have a near-monopoly on powerful AI tools these days? It seems like all of these various AI projects are just a wrapper / frontend that calls OpenAI APIs.
    - ilaksh 3y ago
      I think so but a few open models have closed the gap to maybe around 16% on HumanEval.
- isaacfung 3y ago
  Oobabooga and fastchat support openai compatible APIs so we can use cody with open source local LLMs?
  - sqs 3y ago
    We've got some experimental work to support that. Not merged yet, but you can follow https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody. I've been polling Twitter (https://twitter.com/sqs/status/1675433337354330113 https://twitter.com/sqs/status/1675433337354330113) to see how much people actually are using self-hosted LLMs for code completion already, and it seems like not much yet, but Code Llama with infill is a big advance that we're quite excited about.

Operyl 3y ago

Presumably `Anthropic and OpenAI` according to various documentation.

jdorfman 3y ago
We use OpenAI for their embeddings API. We should have this in our docs, but for now you can read this whitepaper if you are interested: https://about.sourcegraph.com/whitepaper/cody-context-architecture.pdf#page=10 https://about.sourcegraph.com/whitepaper/cody-context-archit...

JieJie 3y ago

According to the FAQ, "Cody has one third-party dependency, which is Anthropic's Claude API. In the config, this can be replaced with OpenAI API." https://docs.sourcegraph.com/cody/faq https://docs.sourcegraph.com/cody/faq

cloudking 3y ago
Looks like a nicely implemented product, unfortunately my experience with Claude is that it's no where near GPT-4 in terms of coding capabilities.
- ForHackernews 3y ago
  Does "Open"AI really have a near-monopoly on powerful AI tools these days? It seems like all of these various AI projects are just a wrapper / frontend that calls OpenAI APIs.
  - ilaksh 3y ago
    I think so but a few open models have closed the gap to maybe around 16% on HumanEval.
isaacfung 3y ago
Oobabooga and fastchat support openai compatible APIs so we can use cody with open source local LLMs?
- sqs 3y ago
  We've got some experimental work to support that. Not merged yet, but you can follow https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody. I've been polling Twitter (https://twitter.com/sqs/status/1675433337354330113 https://twitter.com/sqs/status/1675433337354330113) to see how much people actually are using self-hosted LLMs for code completion already, and it seems like not much yet, but Code Llama with infill is a big advance that we're quite excited about.