4 ms·
If the evidence doesn't exist where it "aught" to be found it is also likely Darwin's theory is incorrect. It is a theory and not a law. Right?
by freedude 3y ago
If the evidence doesn't exist where it "aught" to be found it is also likely Darwin's theory is incorrect. It is a theory and not a law. Right?
- nradov 3y agoThat is illogical. Darwin's theory of evolution through natural selection doesn't contain any specifics on how or where hominids evolved. There is nothing in this article which is inconsistent with Darwin's theory.
- jl6 3y agoDarwin’s theory is “just a theory” in the sense that all scientific theories are just theories, and could potentially be revised if new evidence comes to light. We think the sun will rise tomorrow but that’s just a theory too. Darwin’s theory happens to be the kind of theory that is very well evidenced and consistent with all observations to date, so it would take a truly remarkable discovery to overturn - and this ape ain’t it.