4 ms·

You don't need a link to process and understand what I said about the 11% reduction for every dose. Think a little. Time passes between doses. Even your own st

You don't need a link to process and understand what I said about the 11% reduction for every dose. Think a little. Time passes between doses. Even your own study shows the doses only reduce transmission a little. This transmission are occuring as time goes by. Thus if you check later doses against earlier, yes you'll see a reduction in transmission. Because tons of people were spreading it. You could have done this study with chocolate chip cookies over time and said "yes, 6 months of eating cookies reduces covid transmission by 11%"

CyberDildonics 3y ago
You said it didn't matter, the evidence is the graphs is crystal clear. As vaccines were rolled out there was a massive difference and the pandemic was muted for people who were vaccinated. You are ignoring evidence and hallucinating your own results while repeating your claims over and over. You don't need a link Yes you do. You can't explain why you think what you do. Think a little. Think a little less and leave it up to the experts. yes, 6 months of eating cookies reduces covid transmission by 11%" Over 6 months the difference in cases for vaccinated was a tiny fraction compared to unvaccinated. I showed you this already. How do you explain this? You haven't linked anything of your own, you haven't backed up any of your claims, you haven't explained why you think what you do and you haven't explained where you get your information. Vaccine denial is reality denial.
- talldatethrow 3y ago
  I'm not an encyclopedia of links. There are full time researchers with phds that go more in depth into why you're basically wrong about what you say. If you want to trust the summary generators you read of faulty logic, go for it. All you did was show me a prison study that can be refuted by basic logic, and a graph of labeling that made zero sense for anyone with a brain.
  - CyberDildonics 3y ago
    I'm not an encyclopedia of links. You didn't link anything. There are full time researchers with phds that go more in depth into why you're basically wrong about what you say. Prove it. Show any evidence at all. If you want to trust the summary generators you read of faulty logic, go for it. I showed you multiple graphs. I linked you six different studies and graphs. You linked nothing. You have no evidence. You just keep repeating yourself and saying 'think about it bro'. Show some evidence, show some data, show some statistics, show some real information.
    - talldatethrow 3y ago
      By "I'm not an encyclopedia of links", I meant that I do not have a collection of links of past things I have read to pull from and provide to you. That is why I didn't give you a link. You seem to have reading comprehension problems. It's possible you shouldn't trust what you read anyway, so maybe ask someone you trust to summarize all the anti covid vaccination data and talking points. What do you want me to do? Go into Google or youtube and find you one document or video to explain what has taken people dozens of videos to slowly compile and explain? I dont know you or like you even at this point, so I'm not investing the time. I have consistently sent them to friends, from nurses to doctors to oracle vps. All slowly convinced. Maybe if you had a friend like me you'd be slowly convinced too, or maybe your smarter than the doctors and PhD level engineers I know. Off the top of my head, look up the Dark Horse Podcast on youtube. That is the easiest lowest level stuff my mom can understand and enjoy. You can of course lookup more by listening to what they talk about and going deeper from there.
      - CyberDildonics 3y ago
        You have nothing to provide to back up what you say apparently. Go into Google or youtube and find you one document Yeah, find one document. Why is it so hard for you to show a shred of evidence? Dark Horse Podcast This guy? https://www.wweek.com/news/2023/07/05/local-covid-vaccine-skeptic-and-ivermectin-fan-bret-weinstein-hosts-robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-podcast/ https://www.wweek.com/news/2023/07/05/local-covid-vaccine-sk... Weinstein, host of the DarkHorse Podcast, spent almost three hours talking to the scion of the Kennedy dynasty, who says childhood vaccines are linked to autism, Sirhan B. Sirhan didn’t kill his father, 5G cell towers are being built to control our behavior, and Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates conspired with Big Pharma to profit from COVID vaccines. (None of these claims is true.) Weinstein, a former professor at The Evergreen State College, became a right-wing celebrity during the pandemic after going on Joe Rogan’s podcast and touting a livestock medicine called ivermectin as a cure for COVID, a claim that has been disproven by multiple studies (“Drug & Pony Show,” WW, Sept. 15, 2021), including one described in the Journal of the American Medical Association in October. You can of course lookup more Everything I look up shows the opposite of what you say. This is kook conspiracy theorist nonsense. Get it together, this is no way to go through life.

CyberDildonics 3y ago

You said it didn't matter, the evidence is the graphs is crystal clear. As vaccines were rolled out there was a massive difference and the pandemic was muted for people who were vaccinated. You are ignoring evidence and hallucinating your own results while repeating your claims over and over. You don't need a link Yes you do. You can't explain why you think what you do. Think a little. Think a little less and leave it up to the experts. yes, 6 months of eating cookies reduces covid transmission by 11%" Over 6 months the difference in cases for vaccinated was a tiny fraction compared to unvaccinated. I showed you this already. How do you explain this? You haven't linked anything of your own, you haven't backed up any of your claims, you haven't explained why you think what you do and you haven't explained where you get your information. Vaccine denial is reality denial.

talldatethrow 3y ago
I'm not an encyclopedia of links. There are full time researchers with phds that go more in depth into why you're basically wrong about what you say. If you want to trust the summary generators you read of faulty logic, go for it. All you did was show me a prison study that can be refuted by basic logic, and a graph of labeling that made zero sense for anyone with a brain.
- CyberDildonics 3y ago
  I'm not an encyclopedia of links. You didn't link anything. There are full time researchers with phds that go more in depth into why you're basically wrong about what you say. Prove it. Show any evidence at all. If you want to trust the summary generators you read of faulty logic, go for it. I showed you multiple graphs. I linked you six different studies and graphs. You linked nothing. You have no evidence. You just keep repeating yourself and saying 'think about it bro'. Show some evidence, show some data, show some statistics, show some real information.
  - talldatethrow 3y ago
    By "I'm not an encyclopedia of links", I meant that I do not have a collection of links of past things I have read to pull from and provide to you. That is why I didn't give you a link. You seem to have reading comprehension problems. It's possible you shouldn't trust what you read anyway, so maybe ask someone you trust to summarize all the anti covid vaccination data and talking points. What do you want me to do? Go into Google or youtube and find you one document or video to explain what has taken people dozens of videos to slowly compile and explain? I dont know you or like you even at this point, so I'm not investing the time. I have consistently sent them to friends, from nurses to doctors to oracle vps. All slowly convinced. Maybe if you had a friend like me you'd be slowly convinced too, or maybe your smarter than the doctors and PhD level engineers I know. Off the top of my head, look up the Dark Horse Podcast on youtube. That is the easiest lowest level stuff my mom can understand and enjoy. You can of course lookup more by listening to what they talk about and going deeper from there.
    - CyberDildonics 3y ago
      You have nothing to provide to back up what you say apparently. Go into Google or youtube and find you one document Yeah, find one document. Why is it so hard for you to show a shred of evidence? Dark Horse Podcast This guy? https://www.wweek.com/news/2023/07/05/local-covid-vaccine-skeptic-and-ivermectin-fan-bret-weinstein-hosts-robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-podcast/ https://www.wweek.com/news/2023/07/05/local-covid-vaccine-sk... Weinstein, host of the DarkHorse Podcast, spent almost three hours talking to the scion of the Kennedy dynasty, who says childhood vaccines are linked to autism, Sirhan B. Sirhan didn’t kill his father, 5G cell towers are being built to control our behavior, and Anthony Fauci and Bill Gates conspired with Big Pharma to profit from COVID vaccines. (None of these claims is true.) Weinstein, a former professor at The Evergreen State College, became a right-wing celebrity during the pandemic after going on Joe Rogan’s podcast and touting a livestock medicine called ivermectin as a cure for COVID, a claim that has been disproven by multiple studies (“Drug & Pony Show,” WW, Sept. 15, 2021), including one described in the Journal of the American Medical Association in October. You can of course lookup more Everything I look up shows the opposite of what you say. This is kook conspiracy theorist nonsense. Get it together, this is no way to go through life.