3 ms·
Yeah, but even for fraudulent attribution it would be enough to state that the image is real, without spelling out the name. On the flip side spelling out "fak
by planede 3y ago
Yeah, but even for fraudulent attribution it would be enough to state that the image is real, without spelling out the name.
On the flip side spelling out "fake Emma Watson AI nude" wouldn't be fraudulent attribution.
edit:
But it looks like the js8 takes issue with the image being findable under the name as well, not necessarily with false attribution.
- chii 3y agoWhich is why fake Emma Watson images should not be illegal, as long as there's clear labeling (may be a requirement for watermarking for more permanence).