> I am responding in kind, based on the way you are talking to me. If you were polite, there would be no issue. I've yet to insult or condescend to you, wherea

> I am responding in kind, based on the way you are talking to me. If you were polite, there would be no issue. I've yet to insult or condescend to you, whereas you've condescended to me ("Grow up"). I'm not "psychologising" you, I've said that you're pushing an issue that affects you not at all but is harmful to others, and that you should probably figure out why you're doing that (or, why you refuse to accept you're doing that). Maybe me being polite while pointing it out makes it seem like I'm "psychologising" you, so let me rephrase: you clearly can't keep yourself from harassing people who live life in a totally harmless way, that's real weird, and you might not know how weird it is. > and then pretend that you're a victim when someone responds in kind Again I've not insulted or condescended to you so you're not actually responding in kind, but that aside I don't at all feel like the victim here. > Publishing someone's address online when it's already publicly known what their address is isn't doxing! This analogy doesn't fit, because--again--the connection isn't publicly known. How do I know it's not publicly known? Because I didn't "know" and I looked. I went to marcan's various social media sites and his website, to Asahi Lina's various social media sites and her website, and came up bupkis. So to be honest, I can't corroborate your claim based on what I've seen, and it's not for lack of looking. Could I probably find something? Sure. Do I care to? Not even a little. Basically your argument boils down to: "someone already doxxed this person, so it doesn't matter if someone does it again". I think any reasonable person would think that's wrong.