5 ms·

Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system gene

Looking at the poses, it feels optimized for generating porn, but one example someone showed had a child's face (good god please don't let your "AI" system generate child anything if you want to sell it for porn purposes), and another user noted that their attempt error'd out because it "detected nudity", even though other users get given a nude model by default.

dotancohen 3y ago
I don't know if the thing in the crotch is a penis or a scrotum, but it is definitely NSFW: https://images.generated.photos/0wV1dBnZ15hGneEfqfZT7SdEIillbpDDGY2wX5XkTeI/rs:auto:1024:1024/wm:1:sowe:18:18:0.5/wmid:gp/czM6Ly9odW1hbi1n/ZW5lcmF0b3ItcHJv/ZC83MTkvODVjZTZh/YTctZTU0Yy00Njcx/LThlMGItZTA3OGMy/NGU1ZDAyLnBuZw.jpg https://images.generated.photos/0wV1dBnZ15hGneEfqfZT7SdEIill... My prompt was simply "Standing in front of a rocket.".
- oniony 3y ago
  That image is so full of wtf
- taneq 3y ago
  I’m going with that guy is a reptile in disguise.
- keyle 3y ago
  Good thing you didn't ask for sitting.
- userbinator 3y ago
  It's neither, because this AI doesn't care for gender norms. /s That looks more like a machine, an android perhaps, than an actual human.
- fouc 3y ago
  Oh no, no, no, I'm a rocket man
- brvsft 3y ago
  Hah. I've been playing with StableDiffusion locally and have gotten a few abominations like this myself.
  - dontupvoteme 3y ago
    Whatever you do don't take all those long prompts that include (((aesthetic))) and such and put them in the negative prompt with "human" in the positive prompt. It's not nightmare fuel it's a nightmare engine
- notmeanywhere 3y ago
  I had one generate a fully nude, spread eagle male model w/ a very vivid vagina when I typed in "on couch". Tried it again w/ other randomly generated male and female models with nowhere near the same results w/ any of the other tries...
- redox99 3y ago
  It's interesting that the image has a "mirrored along the X axis" kind of look.
- the-dude 3y ago
  You asked for a phallus symbol, it gave you phallus symbols.
stavros 3y ago
[flagged]
- CapitalistCartr 3y ago
  The argument against it is that the police and prosecutors don't care about your arguments.
- blitz_skull 3y ago
  Probably moral depravity if I had to guess. Not sure why we even need “an argument” against it. It’s pretty self-evidently wrong.
  - wizofaus 3y ago
    What if it turned out it were the only effective way to prevent people engaging in real paedophilia?
    - trehalose 3y ago
      That's a very big "what if". What data could demonstrate that to be true or false?
      - wizofaus 3y ago
        I did have exactly that thought when I posted it. It was more of a thought experiment than anything.
    - JackFr 3y ago
      Prisons?
    - Jolter 3y ago
      But it’s not.
    - dragonwriter 3y ago
      > What if it turned out it were the only effective way to prevent people engaging in real paedophilia? Paedophilia is not synonym for child sex abuse, and to the extent that conjecture hasn't been ruled out by study already, that's at most an argument that its an appropriate function for tightly-controlled research-supporting tools, not a general public business.
nomdep 3y ago
An AI-generated image is just a drawing, not a real human.
- mgbmtl 3y ago
  In Canada, CP drawings are illegal (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Canada https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Ca...)
  - 93po 3y ago
    I believe anything depicting CP is illegal in the US as well
    - MacsHeadroom 3y ago
      The justice department defines it as anything depicting a real identifiable minor. Fictive persons are notably exempt from this definition (regardless of realism of the depiction). Canada is different in that regard.
jacurtis 3y ago
> it feels optimized for porn So I was relatively unimpressed with the first few images, they looked incredibly unrealistic. But then after reading this message i decided to add "topless" to the notes just to see how crazy the result was. I was actually impressed, it returned an image that actually looks lifelike once I gave it an adult request. Which reinforces the idea that this was optimized for porn. For those curious, this was the result I was provided. NSFW of course, topless female gender (ai generated): https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e6c26e190809000fba31b6 https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e6c26e190809000fb...
- jprete 3y ago
  That image is really off-putting. It looks wrong in several ways I can identify and some that I can’t.
  - mkoryak 3y ago
    I can count a number of things wrong with that image on her right hand. 7 or 8.
    - fock 3y ago
      7-finger porn!
      - speed_spread 3y ago
        We're not judging.
- DaveExeter 3y ago
  I tweaked yours a little. [NSFW] https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7e1aee4125d000cdeaa79 https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7e1aee4125d000cd... And then I requested a full bush... [NSFW] https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7e47ff56326000b9e7b15 https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7e47ff56326000b9...
jmkni 3y ago
I made the mistake of opening this in work and had to instantly close it

dotancohen 3y ago

I don't know if the thing in the crotch is a penis or a scrotum, but it is definitely NSFW: https://images.generated.photos/0wV1dBnZ15hGneEfqfZT7SdEIillbpDDGY2wX5XkTeI/rs:auto:1024:1024/wm:1:sowe:18:18:0.5/wmid:gp/czM6Ly9odW1hbi1n/ZW5lcmF0b3ItcHJv/ZC83MTkvODVjZTZh/YTctZTU0Yy00Njcx/LThlMGItZTA3OGMy/NGU1ZDAyLnBuZw.jpg https://images.generated.photos/0wV1dBnZ15hGneEfqfZT7SdEIill... My prompt was simply "Standing in front of a rocket.".

oniony 3y ago
That image is so full of wtf
taneq 3y ago
I’m going with that guy is a reptile in disguise.
keyle 3y ago
Good thing you didn't ask for sitting.
userbinator 3y ago
It's neither, because this AI doesn't care for gender norms. /s That looks more like a machine, an android perhaps, than an actual human.
fouc 3y ago
Oh no, no, no, I'm a rocket man
brvsft 3y ago
Hah. I've been playing with StableDiffusion locally and have gotten a few abominations like this myself.
- dontupvoteme 3y ago
  Whatever you do don't take all those long prompts that include (((aesthetic))) and such and put them in the negative prompt with "human" in the positive prompt. It's not nightmare fuel it's a nightmare engine
notmeanywhere 3y ago
I had one generate a fully nude, spread eagle male model w/ a very vivid vagina when I typed in "on couch". Tried it again w/ other randomly generated male and female models with nowhere near the same results w/ any of the other tries...
redox99 3y ago
It's interesting that the image has a "mirrored along the X axis" kind of look.
the-dude 3y ago
You asked for a phallus symbol, it gave you phallus symbols.

stavros 3y ago

[flagged]

CapitalistCartr 3y ago
The argument against it is that the police and prosecutors don't care about your arguments.
blitz_skull 3y ago
Probably moral depravity if I had to guess. Not sure why we even need “an argument” against it. It’s pretty self-evidently wrong.
- wizofaus 3y ago
  What if it turned out it were the only effective way to prevent people engaging in real paedophilia?
  - trehalose 3y ago
    That's a very big "what if". What data could demonstrate that to be true or false?
    - wizofaus 3y ago
      I did have exactly that thought when I posted it. It was more of a thought experiment than anything.
  - JackFr 3y ago
    Prisons?
  - Jolter 3y ago
    But it’s not.
  - dragonwriter 3y ago
    > What if it turned out it were the only effective way to prevent people engaging in real paedophilia? Paedophilia is not synonym for child sex abuse, and to the extent that conjecture hasn't been ruled out by study already, that's at most an argument that its an appropriate function for tightly-controlled research-supporting tools, not a general public business.

nomdep 3y ago

An AI-generated image is just a drawing, not a real human.

mgbmtl 3y ago
In Canada, CP drawings are illegal (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Canada https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Ca...)
- 93po 3y ago
  I believe anything depicting CP is illegal in the US as well
  - MacsHeadroom 3y ago
    The justice department defines it as anything depicting a real identifiable minor. Fictive persons are notably exempt from this definition (regardless of realism of the depiction). Canada is different in that regard.

jacurtis 3y ago

> it feels optimized for porn So I was relatively unimpressed with the first few images, they looked incredibly unrealistic. But then after reading this message i decided to add "topless" to the notes just to see how crazy the result was. I was actually impressed, it returned an image that actually looks lifelike once I gave it an adult request. Which reinforces the idea that this was optimized for porn. For those curious, this was the result I was provided. NSFW of course, topless female gender (ai generated): https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e6c26e190809000fba31b6 https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e6c26e190809000fb...

jprete 3y ago
That image is really off-putting. It looks wrong in several ways I can identify and some that I can’t.
- mkoryak 3y ago
  I can count a number of things wrong with that image on her right hand. 7 or 8.
  - fock 3y ago
    7-finger porn!
    - speed_spread 3y ago
      We're not judging.
DaveExeter 3y ago
I tweaked yours a little. [NSFW] https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7e1aee4125d000cdeaa79 https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7e1aee4125d000cd... And then I requested a full bush... [NSFW] https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7e47ff56326000b9e7b15 https://generated.photos/human-generator/64e7e47ff56326000b9...

jmkni 3y ago

I made the mistake of opening this in work and had to instantly close it