3 ms·
Why does the CIA have to be involved. Owners of mercenary armies have a long history of starting coups on their own and autocratic dictators have a history of a
by kasey_junk 3y ago
Why does the CIA have to be involved. Owners of mercenary armies have a long history of starting coups on their own and autocratic dictators have a history of assassinating them when they fail.
The CIA’s best option throughout this conflict has been to sit back and let the Russian system self own.
- WhereIsTheTruth 3y ago[flagged]
- JumpCrisscross 3y ago> of course the Five Eyes countries are involved, they are not passive, that would be suicidal The CIA being involved and the CIA cutting a deal with Prighozin are night and day. Of course NATO intelligence is involved. But the only reason to talk to Prighozin about a deal would be to string him along so you can extract info.
- mrguyorama 3y ago>but the only reason to talk to Prighozin about a deal would be to string him along so you can extract info There are rumors that Ukraine actually did exactly this. There are also rumors that he gave them positions of high ranking members of the military for HIMARS strikes.