4 ms·

Don't need to be addictive if they are mandate to keep your job. Unnecessary is up to you.. it's been shown that you still get and transmit covid just as easil

Don't need to be addictive if they are mandate to keep your job. Unnecessary is up to you.. it's been shown that you still get and transmit covid just as easily after the vaccine. So unless you were in a high risk category for death from covid, was it necessary?

CyberDildonics 3y ago
it's been shown that you still get and transmit covid just as easily after the vaccine Absolute nonsense. https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2022/12/424546/covid-19-vaccines-prior-infection-reduce-transmission-omicron https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2022/12/424546/covid-19-vaccines-p... https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/wQkRVy7FUq2G5Cnl1EPz8OgRNr0=/800x0/smart/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/S5YPESIJXNHQVMFSRSRFSRSVJ4.jpeg https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/wQkRVy7FUq2G5Cnl1EPz8OgRNr... So unless you were in a high risk category for death from covid, was it necessary? More nonsense. I will show you with actual information: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-co... https://www.axios.com/2021/10/18/cdc-data-unvaccinated-coronavirus-deaths https://www.axios.com/2021/10/18/cdc-data-unvaccinated-coron... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FN6AdgVXEAUm_W2.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FN6AdgVXEAUm_W2.jpg
- talldatethrow 3y ago
  The rate of transmission fell 11% for each booster........ Great. So basically 90% of transmission were still going on. So all you have to explain is a 11% fall over a decently large span of time, during which most transmission of covid were still happening. Sounds like a clear example of natural immunity building due to the vaccinated crowd still transmitting anyway. This stuff is getting comical. Your second graph.. "cases OR deaths". Quality science.
  - CyberDildonics 3y ago
    I guess this is where you back peddle. Sounds like a clear example of natural immunity building due to the vaccinated crowd still transmitting anyway. You are basing this on nothing. You linked nothing, you have no evidence of any kind. You are hallucinating what you want to believe. Your second graph.. "cases OR deaths". Quality science. One of many graphs that I linked. You said: So unless you were in a high risk category for death from covid, was it necessary? Of course it was, you can tell by the overwhelming amount of evidence out there, some of it I linked here. https://images.jifo.co/2547186_1625656875106.png https://images.jifo.co/2547186_1625656875106.png There is a huge spectrum in the severity of an infection. Vaccines reduce the severity and duration of everything. Some people can test positive without symptoms. You would know this if you cared about being informed of reality. Let's see where you get your information.
    - talldatethrow 3y ago
      You don't need a link to process and understand what I said about the 11% reduction for every dose. Think a little. Time passes between doses. Even your own study shows the doses only reduce transmission a little. This transmission are occuring as time goes by. Thus if you check later doses against earlier, yes you'll see a reduction in transmission. Because tons of people were spreading it. You could have done this study with chocolate chip cookies over time and said "yes, 6 months of eating cookies reduces covid transmission by 11%"
      - CyberDildonics 3y ago
        You said it didn't matter, the evidence is the graphs is crystal clear. As vaccines were rolled out there was a massive difference and the pandemic was muted for people who were vaccinated. You are ignoring evidence and hallucinating your own results while repeating your claims over and over. You don't need a link Yes you do. You can't explain why you think what you do. Think a little. Think a little less and leave it up to the experts. yes, 6 months of eating cookies reduces covid transmission by 11%" Over 6 months the difference in cases for vaccinated was a tiny fraction compared to unvaccinated. I showed you this already. How do you explain this? You haven't linked anything of your own, you haven't backed up any of your claims, you haven't explained why you think what you do and you haven't explained where you get your information. Vaccine denial is reality denial.
        talldatethrow 3y ago
        I'm not an encyclopedia of links. There are full time researchers with phds that go more in depth into why you're basically wrong about what you say. If you want to trust the summary generators you read of faulty logic, go for it. All you did was show me a prison study that can be refuted by basic logic, and a graph of labeling that made zero sense for anyone with a brain.
        CyberDildonics 3y ago
        I'm not an encyclopedia of links. You didn't link anything. There are full time researchers with phds that go more in depth into why you're basically wrong about what you say. Prove it. Show any evidence at all. If you want to trust the summary generators you read of faulty logic, go for it. I showed you multiple graphs. I linked you six different studies and graphs. You linked nothing. You have no evidence. You just keep repeating yourself and saying 'think about it bro'. Show some evidence, show some data, show some statistics, show some real information.

CyberDildonics 3y ago

it's been shown that you still get and transmit covid just as easily after the vaccine Absolute nonsense. https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2022/12/424546/covid-19-vaccines-prior-infection-reduce-transmission-omicron https://www.ucsf.edu/news/2022/12/424546/covid-19-vaccines-p... https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/wQkRVy7FUq2G5Cnl1EPz8OgRNr0=/800x0/smart/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/advancelocal/S5YPESIJXNHQVMFSRSRFSRSVJ4.jpeg https://www.cleveland.com/resizer/wQkRVy7FUq2G5Cnl1EPz8OgRNr... So unless you were in a high risk category for death from covid, was it necessary? More nonsense. I will show you with actual information: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-co... https://www.axios.com/2021/10/18/cdc-data-unvaccinated-coronavirus-deaths https://www.axios.com/2021/10/18/cdc-data-unvaccinated-coron... https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FN6AdgVXEAUm_W2.jpg https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FN6AdgVXEAUm_W2.jpg

talldatethrow 3y ago
The rate of transmission fell 11% for each booster........ Great. So basically 90% of transmission were still going on. So all you have to explain is a 11% fall over a decently large span of time, during which most transmission of covid were still happening. Sounds like a clear example of natural immunity building due to the vaccinated crowd still transmitting anyway. This stuff is getting comical. Your second graph.. "cases OR deaths". Quality science.
- CyberDildonics 3y ago
  I guess this is where you back peddle. Sounds like a clear example of natural immunity building due to the vaccinated crowd still transmitting anyway. You are basing this on nothing. You linked nothing, you have no evidence of any kind. You are hallucinating what you want to believe. Your second graph.. "cases OR deaths". Quality science. One of many graphs that I linked. You said: So unless you were in a high risk category for death from covid, was it necessary? Of course it was, you can tell by the overwhelming amount of evidence out there, some of it I linked here. https://images.jifo.co/2547186_1625656875106.png https://images.jifo.co/2547186_1625656875106.png There is a huge spectrum in the severity of an infection. Vaccines reduce the severity and duration of everything. Some people can test positive without symptoms. You would know this if you cared about being informed of reality. Let's see where you get your information.
  - talldatethrow 3y ago
    You don't need a link to process and understand what I said about the 11% reduction for every dose. Think a little. Time passes between doses. Even your own study shows the doses only reduce transmission a little. This transmission are occuring as time goes by. Thus if you check later doses against earlier, yes you'll see a reduction in transmission. Because tons of people were spreading it. You could have done this study with chocolate chip cookies over time and said "yes, 6 months of eating cookies reduces covid transmission by 11%"
    - CyberDildonics 3y ago
      You said it didn't matter, the evidence is the graphs is crystal clear. As vaccines were rolled out there was a massive difference and the pandemic was muted for people who were vaccinated. You are ignoring evidence and hallucinating your own results while repeating your claims over and over. You don't need a link Yes you do. You can't explain why you think what you do. Think a little. Think a little less and leave it up to the experts. yes, 6 months of eating cookies reduces covid transmission by 11%" Over 6 months the difference in cases for vaccinated was a tiny fraction compared to unvaccinated. I showed you this already. How do you explain this? You haven't linked anything of your own, you haven't backed up any of your claims, you haven't explained why you think what you do and you haven't explained where you get your information. Vaccine denial is reality denial.
      - talldatethrow 3y ago
        I'm not an encyclopedia of links. There are full time researchers with phds that go more in depth into why you're basically wrong about what you say. If you want to trust the summary generators you read of faulty logic, go for it. All you did was show me a prison study that can be refuted by basic logic, and a graph of labeling that made zero sense for anyone with a brain.
        CyberDildonics 3y ago
        I'm not an encyclopedia of links. You didn't link anything. There are full time researchers with phds that go more in depth into why you're basically wrong about what you say. Prove it. Show any evidence at all. If you want to trust the summary generators you read of faulty logic, go for it. I showed you multiple graphs. I linked you six different studies and graphs. You linked nothing. You have no evidence. You just keep repeating yourself and saying 'think about it bro'. Show some evidence, show some data, show some statistics, show some real information.