Are we reading the same paper? In the graph I'm looking at the axis where the model underperforms the doctor is labeled "No inaccurate/irrelevant information",

Are we reading the same paper? In the graph I'm looking at the axis where the model underperforms the doctor is labeled "No inaccurate/irrelevant information", which has nothing to do with making the correct diagnostic. The three important axes "Answer supported by consensus", "Possible harm extent = No harm" and "Low likelihood of harm" it is performing really similarly to the doctors, probably similar to the graph a single middle of the pack doctor would have. Are you reading a different graph or am I misunderstanding something about it?