3 ms·
Maybe he’s deliberately learning/teaching how to change things arbitrarily. He senses the organization would have a lot of trouble making a button red or changi
by hyperhello 3y ago
Maybe he’s deliberately learning/teaching how to change things arbitrarily. He senses the organization would have a lot of trouble making a button red or changing a vendor, he demands it, just to shake all the rust off.
Later when he’s got control, he can supposedly add every feature back. Maybe he’s visualizing his boondoggle as still worth $44 billion any time he chooses to restore the way it was.
- 3cats-in-a-coat 3y agoApparently he believes he bought 44 billions of rust. He’s systematically dismantling everything. Fired all the top management. Then fired most employees. Got rid of most offices. Abandoned employees in many countries without pay. Shut down multiple data centers. Even sold everything not bolted to the ground in offices he uses. Got rid of entire apps like TweetDeck, castrated the API and made it useless (so millions of bot accounts are back with vengeance). Destroyed the moderation system, and the verification system. Nuked the brand and replaced it with a placeholder X. He even tried to remove the ability to link to other networks (Threads content is still shadow banned) and tried to limit users to 10 minutes of normal activity with rate limiting. Now he’s removing Twitter features one by one until nothing is left. The only thing he added after a year of work is asking people for money for things that were free. That’s the innovation. Oh and the illegal X sign. That was removed after three days.
- mgiannopoulos 3y agoTweetdeck still exists https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/ https://tweetdeck.twitter.com/