3 ms·
Yes, that is a good place to start from. Look at it this way: we have starvation in the world at that 2% due to both issues growing food and indirect issues (tr
by 1123581321 3y ago
Yes, that is a good place to start from. Look at it this way: we have starvation in the world at that 2% due to both issues growing food and indirect issues (transportation, fuel, lack of opportunity, corruption.) If agriculture jobs were forced to 2.5%, what kind of pressure would that put on everything else involved in successfully distributing food. And what would that in turn do to the percentage forced to do more localized agriculture or subsistence work. And what would the costs of and political/behavioral (over)reactions to the shock and the unevenness of each of those adjustments be.