4 ms·
A lot of people on this thread revealing they can't read "in context" and are upset if every term used doesn't have a footnote. I guess all the people complain
by fellowniusmonk 3y ago
A lot of people on this thread revealing they can't read "in context" and are upset if every term used doesn't have a footnote.
I guess all the people complaining would prefer lawyer speak:
"FD&C¹ dyes (hearinafter known as DYES)"
¹ FD&C the U.S.² act governing (and defining) the regulation of food, drugs and cosmetics. This act is enforced by the FDA.
² The United States Of America
Addendum: This article is about how the FD&C (as an Act) defines a dye vs a lake.
- cvs268 3y agoWhat's a FDA? :-)
- Dylan16807 3y agoThe title promises that the article is going to explain "FD&C Dyes and Lakes" That's three words, and I expect all three to be defined. I think that's a pretty reasonable request, not an inability to handle context or a desire for lawyer speak. Context doesn't help explain FD&C at all. It's only in the body of the article once, and it could easily be a technical term.