3 ms·

Equity wasn't a typo. It refer to the policy of quotas, whether it be official or unofficial. And isn't it a valid social phenomenon to be studied, proved, or d

Equity wasn't a typo. It refer to the policy of quotas, whether it be official or unofficial. And isn't it a valid social phenomenon to be studied, proved, or disproved? Surely, if equity or pay policies are being gamed, then perhaps it might be useful to look into it. And obviously, if you are here for the technical discussions, why did you click on a thread about salaries of men vs. women? Finally...this place is ruled by emotion just like every other place. It's only when everyone agrees that there is rational discussion.

RangerScience 3y ago
> equity https://www.forbes.com/sites/lizelting/2022/09/22/stop-saying-quotas-dont-work-because-they-demonstrably-do/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/lizelting/2022/09/22/stop-sayin... https://www.upstate.edu/diversityinclusion/policies-and-procedures/aa/myth_reality.php https://www.upstate.edu/diversityinclusion/policies-and-proc... Like... it ain't hard to read up on this.
kramerger 3y ago
> if you are here for the technical discussions, why did you click on a thread about salaries of men vs. women? Because maybe I would learn that certain positions or areas are better/worse paid than others? Or that managers at Google are really bad at math? Or who knows, maybe the CEO hires really expensive prostitutes and pay them with company money disguised as salaries?? Not everything needs to be political you know.