> is wording required to enable a mechanism called "legal hold" I don't think this is accurate. At least in Norway you can't "just not" keep records required b

> is wording required to enable a mechanism called "legal hold" I don't think this is accurate. At least in Norway you can't "just not" keep records required by law - any section in a contract in conflict with current law would simply be invalid? I think the section just clarifies that Microsoft will comply with laws requiring them to keep data (eg the "anti-terror" laws that might require data retention).