4 ms·
it's the SOTA for chat(prove me wrong), and you can always use the API directly even for simple tasks they're less reliable and needs more prompt engineering
by FrenchDevRemote 3y ago
it's the SOTA for chat(prove me wrong), and you can always use the API directly
even for simple tasks they're less reliable and needs more prompt engineering
- baobabKoodaa 3y ago> it's the SOTA for chat(prove me wrong) GPT-4 beats ChatGPT on all benchmarks. You can easily google these.
- stavros 3y agoThe distinction between GPT-4 and ChatGPT is blurry, as ChatGPT is a chat frontend for a GPT model, and you can use GPT-4 with ChatGPT. The parent probably means ChatGPT with GPT-4.
- baobabKoodaa 3y agoTypically when people say "ChatGPT" without specifying which specific model they refer to, they refer to gpt-3.5-turbo (in case of API - or in case of the web ui, they mean whatever model is its current web ui equivalent). But now OP says they meant GPT-4, so, sure.
- stolsvik 3y agoCounterpoint: I don’t refer to 3.5 when I say ChatGPT. I pay for ChatGPT, and always use GPT-4. Which I believe every paying customer do.
- Kiro 3y agoI tried and got nothing useful. What's the difference between GPT-4 and ChatGPT Plus using GPT-4?
- FrenchDevRemote 3y agothat is why i said FOR CHAT. even through the API you can't easily use the regular models for chat, the parsing would be atrocious and there are hundreds of edge cases to handle. ChatGPT4 through the API is the SOTA