4 ms·

> there are plenty of nice places where the houses are 60K. Citation super needed. Where in the US can I buy a house for $60,000? Does it have a roof?

by ctoth 3y ago

vouaobrasil 3y ago
Well, I was thinking of Canada. I found quite a few nice, basic houses (by this, I mean a place you can actually live in, not reno projects) for around $60K USD. I'm talking about sparse provinces like Saskatchewan. I also found some now with a quick search in Alabama (US) for around $70K. Check out sparsely populated, small places in the US, and search for small houses. Hey, I never said it would be a mansion.
- frfl 3y ago
  Houses under 100k CAD are either - So far away from a major (by Canadian standards) city you're basically living in the middle of nowhere - Run down and you're looking at 100k in renovations and upgrades - Unless you're working remotely or are already well off, there are no well paying jobs out in the middle of nowhere - Education is an issue: far away from schools for kids and only southern BC, southern Ontario, southern Quebec have high ranking universities/colleges Any house in a desirable location is out of reach for many people. More and more people are now looking further out, thus driving prices higher in those locations as well. I don't think these people are looking to necessarily move out into the middle of Saskatchewan or other middle-Canada provinces where they can get those 100k homes for the reasons listed above.
  - swader999 3y ago
    100k house in Canada is a mobile home.
    - frfl 3y ago
      Not really. There are actual homes, but they're old and no where close to major cities Couple of examples https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25857143/101-galway-street-limerick https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25857143/101-galway-stree... https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25917262/323-pottery-street-eastend https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25917262/323-pottery-stre... https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25938347/3-pacholok-avenue-ethelbert-r31?view=imagelist https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25938347/3-pacholok-avenu...
      - red-iron-pine 3y ago
        honestly id rather have the mobile home, easier to fix, probably closer to stuff i want [insert meth joke here], and i don't have to worry about the foundation flooding.
its_a_random_ac 3y ago
Spoiler alert: be prepared to spend a ton of money of gas, and hours for driving to any kind of doctor's office beyond a GP. A friend of a friend commuted for 4 hours each day to go to school as a kid because her family lived so far out. I still agree with the general sentiment though. I'm happy with living in a 1br condo and taking public transport, but I had coworkers that "needed" a detached house with a back yard and a moderately expensive car.
- vouaobrasil 3y ago
  Yes, you are very right and point out some valid criticisms. Because the typical 9-5 style has been so effective (it out-competes other life-styles because it is the most useful for our capitalistic, consumerist society), our entire infrastructure is designed around it, which further eliminates alternative options or at least makes them more scary.
  - darksofa 3y ago
    I always though the 9-5 style was because a lot of work is easier when it's light outside and people are awake.
- WarOnPrivacy 3y ago
  > I'm happy with living in a 1br condo and taking public transport, but I had coworkers that "needed" a detached house with a back yard and a moderately expensive car. Where it takes 4+ typical incomes to make basic bills(kind of everywhere), most apartments are a tough option.
- deleted 3y ago
  [deleted]

> there are plenty of nice places where the houses are 60K. Citation super needed. Where in the US can I buy a house for $60,000? Does it have a roof?

by ctoth 3y ago

> there are plenty of nice places where the houses are 60K. Citation super needed. Where in the US can I buy a house for $60,000? Does it have a roof?

vouaobrasil 3y ago

Well, I was thinking of Canada. I found quite a few nice, basic houses (by this, I mean a place you can actually live in, not reno projects) for around $60K USD. I'm talking about sparse provinces like Saskatchewan. I also found some now with a quick search in Alabama (US) for around $70K. Check out sparsely populated, small places in the US, and search for small houses. Hey, I never said it would be a mansion.

frfl 3y ago
Houses under 100k CAD are either - So far away from a major (by Canadian standards) city you're basically living in the middle of nowhere - Run down and you're looking at 100k in renovations and upgrades - Unless you're working remotely or are already well off, there are no well paying jobs out in the middle of nowhere - Education is an issue: far away from schools for kids and only southern BC, southern Ontario, southern Quebec have high ranking universities/colleges Any house in a desirable location is out of reach for many people. More and more people are now looking further out, thus driving prices higher in those locations as well. I don't think these people are looking to necessarily move out into the middle of Saskatchewan or other middle-Canada provinces where they can get those 100k homes for the reasons listed above.
- swader999 3y ago
  100k house in Canada is a mobile home.
  - frfl 3y ago
    Not really. There are actual homes, but they're old and no where close to major cities Couple of examples https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25857143/101-galway-street-limerick https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25857143/101-galway-stree... https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25917262/323-pottery-street-eastend https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25917262/323-pottery-stre... https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25938347/3-pacholok-avenue-ethelbert-r31?view=imagelist https://www.realtor.ca/real-estate/25938347/3-pacholok-avenu...
    - red-iron-pine 3y ago
      honestly id rather have the mobile home, easier to fix, probably closer to stuff i want [insert meth joke here], and i don't have to worry about the foundation flooding.

its_a_random_ac 3y ago

Spoiler alert: be prepared to spend a ton of money of gas, and hours for driving to any kind of doctor's office beyond a GP. A friend of a friend commuted for 4 hours each day to go to school as a kid because her family lived so far out. I still agree with the general sentiment though. I'm happy with living in a 1br condo and taking public transport, but I had coworkers that "needed" a detached house with a back yard and a moderately expensive car.

vouaobrasil 3y ago
Yes, you are very right and point out some valid criticisms. Because the typical 9-5 style has been so effective (it out-competes other life-styles because it is the most useful for our capitalistic, consumerist society), our entire infrastructure is designed around it, which further eliminates alternative options or at least makes them more scary.
- darksofa 3y ago
  I always though the 9-5 style was because a lot of work is easier when it's light outside and people are awake.
WarOnPrivacy 3y ago
> I'm happy with living in a 1br condo and taking public transport, but I had coworkers that "needed" a detached house with a back yard and a moderately expensive car. Where it takes 4+ typical incomes to make basic bills(kind of everywhere), most apartments are a tough option.
deleted 3y ago
[deleted]