5 ms·
Isn’t the most effective way to do 4 to get your thing at the top of Google?
by abduhl 3y ago
Isn’t the most effective way to do 4 to get your thing at the top of Google?
- Zambyte 3y agoIf I want to tell my mom something, the most effective way is not to try to sneak my message into some search result of hers. When I say "target audience" and "humans" I mean it in the most literal sense. The most effective way to tell people that you built something for them is to tell them.
- adventured 3y agoThe premise you're suggesting is only the most effective way to tell a small number of people (ie tell them directly). That's why radio, TV, newspaper advertising was so effective for so long. Even for a small convenience store, larger scale - mass audience, automated - advertising is almost always a necessity and a far more effective use of time.
- lolinder 3y agoLet's make this concrete. Let's say you're CNET—your target audience is millions upon millions of people who are interested in tech news. What is your alternative strategy for telling these tens of millions of people that you have a new article on topic X? Note that only a tiny fraction of your audience is already subscribed to some form of push notification from your service.
- Zambyte 3y ago> What is your alternative strategy for telling these tens of millions of people that you have a new article on topic X? None. I don't know tens of millions of people. Why do you think that CNET - a relatively small group of people - should have the power to reach an influence tens of millions of people, even if only in a small way per person? I don't think that's healthy for anyone involved.
- lolinder 3y agoI see. So when you refer to your mom you meant that literally—humans should only ever strive to do business with people they know directly. I happen to disagree, but it's obvious that we're working from such completely different axioms that there's no point in arguing this further.