4 ms·
From the article: > For example, blocking content from future AI models could decrease a site's or a brand's cultural footprint if AI chatbots become a primary
by vouaobrasil 3y ago
From the article:
> For example, blocking content from future AI models could decrease a site's or a brand's cultural footprint if AI chatbots become a primary user interface in the future.
I would rather leave the internet entirely if AI chatbots become a primary user interface.
- taftster 3y agoWhat's interesting about your statement is that if you knew they were chatbots, then by definition, they wouldn't be AI. e.g. they wouldn't have passed the Turing test. I know what you're saying, and totally agree. Unfortunately the term "AI" is now meaningless.
- aaron695 3y ago[dead]
- vouaobrasil 3y agoTrue enough, but one doesn't need to know whether they are Chatbots. In fact, one doesn't even have to have ever heard of AI/ChatGPT to know that something fundamnetally inhuman and strange were going on. If a person woke up from a coma after Chatbots had taken over the internet, they would immediately notice something very strange and machine-like about the whole experience.
- whelp_24 3y agoThat's not what AI means. Also chatgpt can beat the Turing test often enough.
- danielbln 3y agoComplaining about overloading the word "AI" is like complaining about the term "Cloud". Might as well move past it.
- tomjen3 3y agoWhy? That would imply that they are pretty good for most things - better than what we have now.
- vouaobrasil 3y agoAbsolutely not. That would imply that Chatbots are an optimal solution where the optimality criteria are short-term financial gains for mega-enterprises and the maladaptive instincts of humanity in the unnatural situation of being forced into a highly technological world. Sugary cereals and desserts have taken over much of snacking today, doesn't mean it's a good thing.