3 ms·
I've found that "devops" is a pretty nice niche to fall into, even with all of its warts. And that means devops as in literally a developer who can also provisi
by conor- 3y ago
I've found that "devops" is a pretty nice niche to fall into, even with all of its warts. And that means devops as in literally a developer who can also provision/manage infra and operations and not just a YAML jockey who gets a buzzword title. You can kind of pick your lane: dev-experience tooling, build systems, infrastructure automation, observability systems, etc.
It's a nice way to break out of the rat race of bad practices and questionable frameworks being used all over the place and it seems pretty secure because most of the tail-chasing framework types aren't exactly keen to learn the details of what actually takes code from 0 to production-grade so having the breadth of knowledge becomes an asset that lets you work on a variety of problems. Obviously there's a different slew of annoying things to deal with (wrangling cloud services, insane abstraction around infrastructure, etc.) but I think those are more pleasant to work around.
The infra-side of things also hasn't really slowed down in hiring like pure developer positions has.
- capr 3y agoThat could work except there's just as much BS in devops as in dev. The fact that this job title exists at all to me is a symptom of the same problem.