3 ms·
That's my point. That's what makes it dangerous. You can't limit the performance if you want to compete. And like I said, you can't even really keep humans in t
by ilaksh 3y ago
That's my point. That's what makes it dangerous. You can't limit the performance if you want to compete. And like I said, you can't even really keep humans in the loop.
So eventually you get something like a 200 IQ GPT tightly integrated with SuperAlphaZero (DeepMind) controlling hypersonic drones, missiles, satellite weapons, etc. planning and operating at 50-100 times human thinking speed engaging in autonomous warfare between East and West. No military analyst really knows WTF is happening because the plans and asset movements are so much faster than any human can comprehend.
- slashdev 3y agoThat seems like a stretch, bit off slippery slope fallacy there. Will we see AI use in warfare? Absolutely. Will humans trust warfare totally to AI? Not any time soon. I wouldn’t trust my lunch order to AI yet.