And Friedman? I mean, maybe add on Paxton if you want to be more detailed about fascism, but why listen to Friedman more than my uncle? I don't like the Wikipe

And Friedman? I mean, maybe add on Paxton if you want to be more detailed about fascism, but why listen to Friedman more than my uncle? I don't like the Wikipedia article either tbh, as in my opinion it doesn't go in details about what Paxton means (to avoid defacing I guess?), but Friedman as a source on fascism... I will stay polite, but this kind of stuff is why I'm becoming more and more elitist when it comes to discussing political ideologies. I can discuss with an edgy fascist who just read Nietzsch (or even internalized him) and historian's books on WW2. I actually did, multiple times (the same one). I can discuss with a priest who is a theology major (and minor in history). I feed from their knowledge and interpretation. What can I get from people this ignorant? 'je parle pas aux cons, ça les instruits' wrote Audiard, I thought it was just a funny line, now that I'm older I see what he meant.