3 ms·
Controversial just means the topic to be in dispute. It is a question of semantics and precision of language. In that regard the flag on a wiki site is certainl
by raxxorraxor 3y ago
Controversial just means the topic to be in dispute. It is a question of semantics and precision of language. In that regard the flag on a wiki site is certainly justified.
- orwin 3y agoIs the gravity article controversial then? And the article on particle physics? At least be consistent, I mean, please.
- raxxorraxor 3y agoBecause that isn't comparable. Evolution is controversial because it collides with a lot of other beliefs. Particle physics and gravity generally don't, if only because people aren't familiar with the intrinsics...
- orwin 3y agoI don't see why it's that different? I mean, gravity and just basic physics contradict the Bible way more than evolution, no?
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y agoWhat in the Bible is at odds with gravity?
- orwin 3y agoAll of genesis? Young earth specifically (unless Christian's god created the moon with initial velocity). I've read an article from a Hindi that basically explained how their religion was much more science-proof than the monotheisms. Also, looking into Ramadan for weird reasons, I recently found an article about how the Coran was more scientific-friendly than the bible, with example from the new testament. Both where cherry picked bull* but I should have kept the links, it was quite fun and I probably would have had more examples.
- yjftsjthsd-h 3y ago> unless Christian's god created the moon with initial velocity If God can create matter and energy ex nihilo, why would He have any difficulty with setting a moon in motion to have a stable orbit? This feels like arguing that humans break the laws of physics every time we lift an object and throw it.
- raxxorraxor 3y agoEver saw a preacher dispute gravity? This stopped being intellectually honest for quite a while now...