3 ms·
Directly? Not a lot. Indirectly, it kickstarted global CBDCs research, blockchain-integration research across major financial institutions, tokenisation effort
by cyrillite 3y ago
Directly? Not a lot.
Indirectly, it kickstarted global CBDCs research, blockchain-integration research across major financial institutions, tokenisation efforts, etc.
Would all these things have happened anyway? Yeah, maybe. I don’t know if blockchains in the form we got them were necessary, but they surely are this possible world’s ignition.
Will this all be beneficial in the long run? TBD. But, the story isn’t over yet.
Crypto was possibly a net fuck up though
- ozr 3y ago> Indirectly, it kickstarted global CBDCs research, blockchain-integration research across major financial institutions, tokenisation efforts, etc. These are also all negatives. Profound wastes of time.
- notatoad 3y ago>Indirectly, it kickstarted global CBDCs research, blockchain-integration research across major financial institutions, tokenisation efforts, etc. none of those things are things. research into more crypto is not a benefit of crypto. it's just crypto.
- takeda 3y agoHad that research being something valuable, you would have a point, but as of now crypto just led to more crypto. That's not a benefit.