3 ms·
Peto's paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peto%27s_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peto%27s_paradox is interesting and relevant to your question. To su
by penteract 3y ago
Peto's paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peto%27s_paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peto%27s_paradox is interesting and relevant to your question. To summarize, larger species have evolved better defences against cancer, because they have more cells, so would otherwise experience far more cancer. There's some evidence that these defences reduce fertility, so aren't selected for in smaller species.
Also, the evolution of cancer cells to get around an immune system happens on a completely different timescale to the selective pressures for the human immune system to avoid cancer (days vs decades).
- nradov 3y agoYes, and there are a few exceptions in the form of small animals which rarely get cancer such as the naked mole rat. This is an area of active research to see if their cancer defenses can be used to develop drugs for humans. https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41568-018-0004-9 https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41568-018-0004-9