3 ms·
Deceptive writing. It's just the outdated (and presumably insecure) Hive Nano 1, that is being deactivated early, and for a good reason probably. The author sho
by 39Wc 3y ago
Deceptive writing. It's just the outdated (and presumably insecure) Hive Nano 1, that is being deactivated early, and for a good reason probably. The author should explain the necessity to switch off insecure products and motivate people to stay up to date in terms of IT security. Instead, the text makes it sound like some villain corporation is trying to screw their customers for no good reason at all.
https://community.hivehome.com/s/article/Nano1-shutdown-Steps-to-upgrade https://community.hivehome.com/s/article/Nano1-shutdown-Step...
- OtomotO 3y agoSo, for a smart home where some parts are actually, well "hidden" in the building you find if feasible to just upgrade? I mean, how much could a house cost, right? Stuff like this should be forbidden. Non-experts simply cannot fathom the consequences of their decisions. Nobody would expect parts of their house need complete replacement after just 7 years (if they were in good condition in the first place and there was no catastrophe) This is not even talking about e-waste and the environmental issues that arise from more high tech garbage
- IshKebab 3y agoAre you just guessing that it's insecure and for some reason that can't be fixed with a software update? Your link doesn't mention that as far as I can see.
- gambiting 3y agoNano 1 was on sale as recently as 2016. It's only 7 years old - there is literally no reason why they can't keep it working. And if they say they can't they are literally incompetent and their tech department needs to be replaced.