5 ms·

>-God of War Ragnarok playstation exclusive >-Tears of the Kingdom nintendo exclusive >-Hogwarts Legacy I don't know anyone who has played it - maybe we're

>-God of War Ragnarok playstation exclusive >-Tears of the Kingdom nintendo exclusive >-Hogwarts Legacy I don't know anyone who has played it - maybe we're just not that interested in harry potter >-Star Wars Jedi Survivor launched with multiple huge bugs including progression stopping bugs. I'll get it when its cheap and theyve fixed everything, or they haven't and I won't. If your game is bugged from day one don't expect day one pricing to work out. >Final Fantasy XVI playstation exclusive. out of your list there the only ones not platform exclusive or riddled with bugs on launch is hogwarts legacy which honestly doesn't sound like anything I'd be interested in playing.

gaws 3y ago
> God of War Ragnarok > playstation exclusive Don't fret. It'll be ported to PC, just like the first game.
- LegitShady 3y ago
  its not a question of fretting, its just a question of "is this game available for most people to play" and the answer is "just playstation owners" so not generally, no.
password54321 3y ago
*timed exclusive, plus Switch emulator.
- LegitShady 3y ago
  an exclusive is an exclusive. "timed exclusive" is an exclusive. Also not interested in dealing with piracy and other things for switch emulator - there's no way for a normal person to buy the game and play it on a switch emulator - you need an old version of the switch to dump it even if you wanted to, so you have to have the platform to emulate it without piracy anyways.
gardenhedge 3y ago
Hogwarts Legacy is recommended
- LegitShady 3y ago
  im just not into harry potter
  - ChoGGi 3y ago
    I watched a couple of the movies years ago. the game is enjoyable and very well done, I'd probably have more fun if I was an actual fan. You can definitely see the amount of effort put into recreating the castle/town.
    - LegitShady 3y ago
      I read all the books (decades ago? has it been that long?) and I'm sure I've seen some of the movies on flights I'm just not into roleplaying it.
Loocid 3y ago
This feels like moving goal posts. Why does platform exclusivity exclude them from being considered in this discussion? They are still all very successful AAA games that have no microtransactions.
- LegitShady 3y ago
  "look at all the great non microtransaction filled games you can play" "...if you happen to own those consoles" Those games are only available if you own that specific exclusive platform, not to the general public on any mainstream platform, so are niche on purpose. They're not really available without an investment into a specific platform. so in the discussion of 'look at all these amazing non microtransaction filled games' adding ones that require I spend $300-500 on their platform is relevant.
- account42 3y ago
  Because the disussion is taking place in the context of not-platform exclusive game with the article title talking about the number of concurrent Steam (ie. PC) players. If you don't want to pay for hardware you don't get to own then console games might as well not exist.

gaws 3y ago

> God of War Ragnarok > playstation exclusive Don't fret. It'll be ported to PC, just like the first game.

LegitShady 3y ago
its not a question of fretting, its just a question of "is this game available for most people to play" and the answer is "just playstation owners" so not generally, no.

password54321 3y ago

*timed exclusive, plus Switch emulator.

LegitShady 3y ago
an exclusive is an exclusive. "timed exclusive" is an exclusive. Also not interested in dealing with piracy and other things for switch emulator - there's no way for a normal person to buy the game and play it on a switch emulator - you need an old version of the switch to dump it even if you wanted to, so you have to have the platform to emulate it without piracy anyways.

gardenhedge 3y ago

Hogwarts Legacy is recommended

LegitShady 3y ago
im just not into harry potter
- ChoGGi 3y ago
  I watched a couple of the movies years ago. the game is enjoyable and very well done, I'd probably have more fun if I was an actual fan. You can definitely see the amount of effort put into recreating the castle/town.
  - LegitShady 3y ago
    I read all the books (decades ago? has it been that long?) and I'm sure I've seen some of the movies on flights I'm just not into roleplaying it.

Loocid 3y ago

This feels like moving goal posts. Why does platform exclusivity exclude them from being considered in this discussion? They are still all very successful AAA games that have no microtransactions.

LegitShady 3y ago
"look at all the great non microtransaction filled games you can play" "...if you happen to own those consoles" Those games are only available if you own that specific exclusive platform, not to the general public on any mainstream platform, so are niche on purpose. They're not really available without an investment into a specific platform. so in the discussion of 'look at all these amazing non microtransaction filled games' adding ones that require I spend $300-500 on their platform is relevant.
account42 3y ago
Because the disussion is taking place in the context of not-platform exclusive game with the article title talking about the number of concurrent Steam (ie. PC) players. If you don't want to pay for hardware you don't get to own then console games might as well not exist.