3 ms·
...and as an employer I'm going to look for the person who doesn't elevate parrot care to the level that you have. We're both right.
by skeeter2020 3y ago
...and as an employer I'm going to look for the person who doesn't elevate parrot care to the level that you have. We're both right.
- unsupp0rted 3y agoBy preferring someone else, you are treading on my fundamental human right to have to care for the parrots I chose to have. At minimum you should make up plausible-sounding fake reasons for why you prioritize parrotless applicants over me.
- sanderjd 3y agoBut there is a reason that we have some amount of legal structure (and should have a lot more IMO) to avoid employment discrimination against people who have children, but not people who have lots of parrots: Unlike pet parrots, children are very important to society, and societies that fail to incentive having children end up with fewer children, and that's bad.
- Wowfunhappy 3y ago> and societies that fail to incentive having children end up with fewer children, and that's bad. I mean, citation needed. I know that e.g. Japan is having issues with an aging population but they could probably fix that with more immigration if they wanted to. The US certainly could.
- sanderjd 3y agoThere is lots of data on this. Immigration is also good, we should have a lot more of that too IMO.