4 ms·
No, but filenames should never have supported anything other than plain ASCII. Not only filenames but anything that has semantic meaning or is otherwise relevan
by mike_hock 3y ago
No, but filenames should never have supported anything other than plain ASCII. Not only filenames but anything that has semantic meaning or is otherwise relevant to the functioning of the system.
Unicode should have been confined strictly to document content and UI presentation.
- nradov 3y agoSo Germans shouldn't be allowed to use "ä" in their file names?
- nottorp 3y agoLike the hive mind is trying to make logging in ultracomplicated for security reasons, why not dissalow confusing characters in file names for security reasons? Oh but it would make file names less complex. We can't have that. Edit: btw, how many ways can you express an "ă" in Unicode? How many different file names that look the same visually can you end up with?
- Tainnor 3y agoIt's only English people who find "ä" confusing. The provincialism in this thread...
- nottorp 3y agoYou don't know about the many ways to represent an Unicode character and the 4 normal forms then. Easy to wonder why I say it's enterprise complex in that case, but it is.
- swexbe 3y agoNo true german would ever have a hard time discerning between ä and ă. That would be like mixing up p and b for an anglophone.
- nottorp 3y ago:) I'm not german. My language doesn't use ä but it uses ă. Thanks for noticing. My point still stands.
- mike_hock 3y agoYes, and Asian languages would have to use transliterations. So what? Security over convenience.