4 ms·
I do not think water features are mutually exclusive with accessability.
by Aeolun 3y ago
I do not think water features are mutually exclusive with accessability.
- TylerE 3y agoWhen they have a walking stones over them they are. The picture from TFA literally shows people jumping from stone to stone, with path and benches on EITHER side, and near as I can tell from the photo there is no obvious bypass. This is the photo: https://i0.wp.com/cabel.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/tokyo.jpg?resize=1024%2C895&ssl=1 https://i0.wp.com/cabel.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/tokyo... I don't really see any way that wouldn't be an ADA violation.
- defrost 3y ago> near as I can tell from the photo there is no obvious bypass. reply Perhaps across the bridge the photographer is standing on .. ? Can't see that? Nor can I. Point being it's such a tight shot there could be any number of alternative routes, jumping across the stones needn't be the only path.
- rtpg 3y agoI am 99% certain there is a walkway there. There are plenty of absolutely inaccessible places in the Tokyo metropolitan area, but Tokyo Disneyland has a pretty flat/maintained walkway to give access to the whole park as the primary way of moving around IIRC
- sneak 3y agoBuilding all public spaces for the least common denominator turns all of society into Harrison Bergeron.
- defrost 3y agoNonsense. Wheelchair access from the get go and such niceties doesn't lead to ad absurdum leg breaking of the able.