4 ms·

And it was published in Nature Medicine without peer review

• tokai 3y ago
  To be fair its a correspondence. Not usually peer-viewed as they are supposed to contain no new research, and be a point-of-view discussion on issues that are of general interest to the reads of said journal.
  • baja_blast 3y ago
    Sure, but I see it used all time time as "peer reviewed sources" to debunk a lab origin all the time. The authors themselves on twitter even refer to it as having been peer reviewed.
    • dekhn 3y ago
      Peer review is really no guarantee of anything. It catches some problems, sometimes.