I agree with GP after investigating your response, TL;DR: because it's very narrowly true: mentioned once, can be found via [searching the article]. Investigat

I agree with GP after investigating your response, TL;DR: because it's very narrowly true: mentioned once, can be found via [searching the article]. Investigation revealed the context of this single mention is a claim that it is a lie to say the modalities are different. This context is created for a claim that [recent metastudies] showing therapy effective are falsified, proof being the modalities are all moderate to high effectiveness. The reading of it is a polemic against a They, starting as "experts" in the subtitle and continuing throughout, leaving a generally correct GP versus a narrow claim that a modality name is mentioned once.