3 ms·
I think we need more frameworks like Bootstrap. If people are wanting to simplify design by conforming to a framework, why not give them more choice so we don't
by jamesu 15y ago
I think we need more frameworks like Bootstrap. If people are wanting to simplify design by conforming to a framework, why not give them more choice so we don't end up with a hundred websites which all look like Twitter?
- willy1234x1 15y agoFoundation by ZURB is another awesome framework, then there's Blueprint, YAML and can't forget 960gs. Personally I use none of them, I developed my own framework that I've dubbed Frankenwork as it's a culmination of the things I like from each of the well-known frameworks.
- Kudos 15y agohttp://foundation.zurb.com/ http://foundation.zurb.com/
- jenius 15y agoI'm making one right now. But it's not a standard framework, it's a sass framework, so the 'utility classes' are pushed back to css mixins and they take parameters so they are all super flexible. I'm really excited to put it out and it's getting there, but there's a lot of polish left to go. If anyone is interested in helping out or testing, look me up (my name is jeff escalante) and send me an email.
- vineet 15y agoMore frameworks like Bootstrap is not a bad idea. But, if you don't want a hundred websites that look like Twitter, then perhaps the right answer is having a themes that are based on Bootstrap - like what http://wrapbootstrap.com/ http://wrapbootstrap.com/ and http://bootswatch.com/ http://bootswatch.com/ are doing.