3 ms·
I read the whole transcript of the Fridman podcast after your comment. There were a lot of interesting side discussions about history but I still can't avoid s
by dekhn 3y ago
I read the whole transcript of the Fridman podcast after your comment. There were a lot of interesting side discussions about history but I still can't avoid seeing him as an anti-science, anti-establishment conspiracy nut, even if I bend over backwards to be as generous as possible.
The virology community isn't debating him because if you debate the conspiracy nuts, you give them creedence and also it's 100X harder to disprove bad ideas.