3 ms·
Normally I wouldn't object like this, but this actually confused me so I'll share it. This should be "HTML-first full stack web framework". I initially read as
by jerf 3y ago
Normally I wouldn't object like this, but this actually confused me so I'll share it. This should be "HTML-first full stack web framework". I initially read as "The HTML (first full stack web framework)" which immediately soured me on the claim to somehow be the first full stack web framework. Or some other reformulation of the motto which eliminates "first full stack web framework" from a potential garden-path interpretation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden-path_sentence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden-path_sentence , so as to spice up my grammar complaint with an HN-style link of interest.
- rob 3y agoYou're in luck, I can still edit my post! (I just copy/pasted the website's <meta> description without thinking too much about it. I agree though.)
- soneca 3y agoCool link, thanks. And I wondered if that was possible in Portuguese, there was a Portuguese example :)
- nonethewiser 3y agoI actually read it this way too. My first reaction was "wait, what are all these other frameworks missing?"