4 ms·

From the abstract: > Generalist biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) systems that flexibly encode, integrate, and interpret this data at scale can potential

From the abstract: > Generalist biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) systems that flexibly encode, integrate, and interpret this data at scale can potentially enable impactful applications ranging from scientific discovery to care delivery. The problem with AI models is it may bring us medical innovations that are actually harmful to humanity, such as increased lifespans, which in turn will drive further overpopulation.

ChatGTP 3y ago
I know you're trolling, but don't worry AI would have the answer to this solution too!! Don't you get it?
- vouaobrasil 3y ago
  I am not trolling. I genuinely believe that AI will bring more harm than good to humanity and I am trying to point out the specific ways it will be whenever new AI developments come about. Surely to every new development there are also cons or negatives as well as positives?
  - balfirevic 3y ago
    > AI will bring more harm than good to humanity and I am trying to point out the specific ways it will be whenever new AI developments come about And what you managed to come up with is... people will live longer! That's just hilarious :-D
seydor 3y ago
Any AI worth its salt would not enable the proliferation of such puny intelligences as humans.
uejfiweun 3y ago
You don't think they may also bring us transportation, agricultural and logistical innovations that will make increasing the population a non-issue? If we actually reach a point of technological singularity, it may well be the case that we are living amongst the stars within 10 years. Nobody knows. I wouldn't worry too much.
- vouaobrasil 3y ago
  An increasing population is already an issue. Perhaps not for humans, but for non-human life. More transportation and agriculture means more ways to get to new locations, which in turn means the eradication of the natural environment there. Of course, we could follow the advice of E.O. Wilson and preserve half the earth for other life-forms, but I have little trust that we could do that, especially in developing countries. No, new developments in transportation are unlikely to solve anything, except give some people more space in the short-term, and cause even more habitat destruction. New efficiencies in agriculture will help in the short term, but then make producing new humans even more efficient, causing even more destruction. As for your predictions that we will be living in the stars, that's depressing. On spaceships and barren planets? Think terraforming will help? We can't even take care of one of the easiest planets on the solar system, earth.
zaptheimpaler 3y ago
Too bad there are already millions of people working in medicine. Over the past 200 years they have consistently added about 3 months to average lifespan every year. It's too late doomer!!

ChatGTP 3y ago

I know you're trolling, but don't worry AI would have the answer to this solution too!! Don't you get it?

vouaobrasil 3y ago
I am not trolling. I genuinely believe that AI will bring more harm than good to humanity and I am trying to point out the specific ways it will be whenever new AI developments come about. Surely to every new development there are also cons or negatives as well as positives?
- balfirevic 3y ago
  > AI will bring more harm than good to humanity and I am trying to point out the specific ways it will be whenever new AI developments come about And what you managed to come up with is... people will live longer! That's just hilarious :-D

seydor 3y ago

Any AI worth its salt would not enable the proliferation of such puny intelligences as humans.

uejfiweun 3y ago

You don't think they may also bring us transportation, agricultural and logistical innovations that will make increasing the population a non-issue? If we actually reach a point of technological singularity, it may well be the case that we are living amongst the stars within 10 years. Nobody knows. I wouldn't worry too much.

vouaobrasil 3y ago
An increasing population is already an issue. Perhaps not for humans, but for non-human life. More transportation and agriculture means more ways to get to new locations, which in turn means the eradication of the natural environment there. Of course, we could follow the advice of E.O. Wilson and preserve half the earth for other life-forms, but I have little trust that we could do that, especially in developing countries. No, new developments in transportation are unlikely to solve anything, except give some people more space in the short-term, and cause even more habitat destruction. New efficiencies in agriculture will help in the short term, but then make producing new humans even more efficient, causing even more destruction. As for your predictions that we will be living in the stars, that's depressing. On spaceships and barren planets? Think terraforming will help? We can't even take care of one of the easiest planets on the solar system, earth.

zaptheimpaler 3y ago

Too bad there are already millions of people working in medicine. Over the past 200 years they have consistently added about 3 months to average lifespan every year. It's too late doomer!!