4 ms·
> She ripped up a photo of a pope, who...hadn't abused any children. Ah, I guess "just" knowingly covering for repeat child molesters is no big deal. Thanks fo
by clipsy 3y ago
> She ripped up a photo of a pope, who...hadn't abused any children.
Ah, I guess "just" knowingly covering for repeat child molesters is no big deal. Thanks for clarifying your position.
- linksnapzz 3y agoCovering for whom? He didn't believe the accusations against McCarrick, and Bernard Law was never charged criminally for enabling Geoghan (though he should've been).