3 ms·
She wasn't complaining about child abuse (by anyone) onstage at SNL. She ripped up a photo of a pope, who...hadn't abused any children. It was a cheap and safe
by linksnapzz 3y ago
She wasn't complaining about child abuse (by anyone) onstage at SNL.
She ripped up a photo of a pope, who...hadn't abused any children. It was a cheap and safe provocation, and she got the response she wanted.
The existence of valid and necessary criticisms of Church conduct doesn't oblige me or anyone to match each of them to some dinky justification for (in this case) performative juvenile attention-seeking.
I could be less condescending and dismissive, but that would require me to pretend that a pretty basic taunt was some kind of deep commmentary. IOW, taking the piss.
- clipsy 3y ago> She ripped up a photo of a pope, who...hadn't abused any children. Ah, I guess "just" knowingly covering for repeat child molesters is no big deal. Thanks for clarifying your position.
- linksnapzz 3y agoCovering for whom? He didn't believe the accusations against McCarrick, and Bernard Law was never charged criminally for enabling Geoghan (though he should've been).